Viglen VIG830S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemViglen VIG830S  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '23 at 16:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 264
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 109 125 151 179 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 592
Mixed 611
SusWrite 235
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 36.1
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 728
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 502
418% 605 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 157%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 122 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 122
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6MFR8N-TF Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 2560 1440
Typical VIG830S Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Viglen VIG830S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback