QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 22:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
QEMU Virtual version 2.5+
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
70% 131 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 898
79% 671 Pts
64-Core 2,518
156% 2,518 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
202% Outstanding
Lighting 288
Reflection 272
Parallax 291
235% 284 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 247
Splatting 194
213% 271 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 342 199 115 34 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 398
Write 337
Mixed 247
SusWrite 174
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 13.4
52% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 98.5
114% 195 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 106%
Qemu HARDDISK 752GB
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 864 907 806 578 594 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 12% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
283% Outstanding
MC Read 111
MC Write 126
MC Mixed 122
342% 120 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 30.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 283%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 8 64 173.5" 1280 720 BBC0104 HDP-V104
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback