QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 22:39
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
QEMU Virtual version 2.5+
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 53.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
68% 128 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 887
78% 665 Pts
64-Core 2,519
156% 2,519 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 273
Parallax 292
236% 285 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 249
Splatting 194
213% 272 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 203%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 340 151 54 34 7.2 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 282
Write 239
Mixed 258
SusWrite 154
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 11.6
55% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 96.4
114% 196 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 106%
Qemu HARDDISK 752GB
632GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 668 582 321 56 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 12% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
285% Outstanding
MC Read 113
MC Write 129
MC Mixed 120
345% 121 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 33
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 285%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 8 64 173.5" 1280 720 BBC0104 HDP-V104
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback