Micro MG-VCP17A-3080

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro MG-VCP17A-3080  (all builds)
MotherboardMAINGEAR VECTOR Pro 17
Memory51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 16:33
Run Duration77 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 318
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 998
97% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,362
84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1114) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 191
Parallax 183
161% 191 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 147
Splatting 121
120% 151 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 138%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,781
Write 3,788
Mixed 1,838
627% 2,802 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 59.4
189% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 931
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 863
644% 856 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 459%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE320SO204808-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 33
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 30.4
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 0P 5R 8G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 61% 23 218 60 165 17.2" 1707 960 BOE0977
Typical MG-VCP17A-3080 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: Micro MG-VCP17A-3080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback