Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer PI411
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210607
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 15:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 165
2-Core 325
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 625
8-Core 1,098
104% 861 Pts
64-Core 1,248
77% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2014) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 150
Parallax 131
117% 142 fps
MRender 151
Gravity 107
Splatting 102
96% 120 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 108%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB
689GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1820 2167 1495 1497 1487 1499 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,489
Write 2431
Mixed 1,802
SusWrite 1,661
471% 2,096 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 80
261% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 942
702% 936 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 324%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 26.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 14" 1280 720 TMX1400 TL140BDXP02-0
Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback