Micro MG-VCP17A-3080

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro MG-VCP17A-3080  (all builds)
MotherboardMAINGEAR VECTOR Pro 17
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 03:40
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 163
2-Core 310
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,034
100% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1114) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.48
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 180
Parallax 163
148% 175 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
113% 141 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 129%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2373 2696 2712 2624 2833 2862 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2500
Write 1,952
Mixed 1,555
SusWrite 2,683
488% 2,173 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 54.6
182% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 1,116
710% 817 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 350%
Great: 459%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE320SO204808-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 32.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 29.6
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MG-VCP17A-3080 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: Micro MG-VCP17A-3080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback