Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 14:40
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 262
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 761
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 939
58% 939 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2531TB 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 378
Mixed 326
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 34.7
129% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 220
194% 290 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 104%
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,854
Write 1,794
Mixed 1,256
364% 1,635 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64
218% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 900
651% 845 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
KIOXIA TransMemory 32GB
24GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.2
Write 2.2
Mixed 13.2
16% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8RT CB8GU2666.C8ET 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 26.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 9 64 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback