Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '23 at 22:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 882
90% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 29.4
18% 23.8 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 24
Splatting 21.5
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-minder(s) 480G 480GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 403 405 377 408 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 367
Write 465
Mixed 304
SusWrite 399
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 34.6
127% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 74.8
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 158
126% 169 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8RT CB8GU2666.C8ET 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 31.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 23.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback