Asus H61M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-K (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130924
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '23 at 11:55
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1610-$37 5,236 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 54.1 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 76.4 41% 65 Pts	4-Core 71.7 8-Core 85.5 10% 78.6 Pts	64-Core 85 5% 85 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 20.3 17% 19.6 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 16.4 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$69 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 207 220 238 242 242 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.5% Average	Read 140 Write 126 Mixed 142 SusWrite 220 36% 157 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 18.4 53% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 104 84% 118 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	56	60	20"	1600 900	FUS07DF L20T-1 ECO

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	333x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	266x
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	189x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	444x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	147x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	105x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	65x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	49x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	48x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16