Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10 Plus (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10 Plus
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220714
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '23 at 14:57
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2314 26 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 180 61% 110 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 228 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 36TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 33.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 32 38 31 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.7% Very poor	Read 155 Write 100 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 34.5 20% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 1.9 27% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 87.7 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 0.4 24% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 20%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 30 29 35 29 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 150 Write 139 Mixed 86.6 SusWrite 33.1 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.5 527% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 13.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 13.2 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	16	5	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16