American X15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAmerican X15  (all builds)
MotherboardAmerican X15
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 43.3
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 147
48% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 253
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.1
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hjdk 512GB 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 308 330 343 354 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 388
Write 356
Mixed 319
SusWrite 338
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 9.5
44% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 15.9
64% 138 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58%
Great: 189%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
50GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 0 0.2 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.5
Write 41.2
SusWrite 7.4
34% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
45% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x12GB
2 of 2 slots used
24GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 12
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 71 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0872
Typical X15 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: American X15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback