American X15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmerican X15  (all builds)
MotherboardAmerican X15
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 23:36
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 36
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 121
40% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 194
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hjdk 512GB 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2818D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 264 276 274 257 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 295
Write 249
Mixed 262
SusWrite 274
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 7.2
45% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 15.6
56% 121 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x12GB
2 of 2 slots used
24GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 12
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X15 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: American X15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback