Dell OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 00:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i5-13500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 55.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 330
95% 185 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 969
96% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,550
96% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Dell(1028 0BE3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3302
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.1% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 10.9
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC SN740 WD 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73914104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,307
Write 1,787
Mixed 1,542
417% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 66.6
225% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 458
354% 495 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 461%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 12.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.5" 1920 1080 VSCD22B VG2439 Series
Typical OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback