Dell OptiPlex Micro 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex Micro 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex Micro 7010  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 20:57
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i5-13500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 31.1
1-Core 174
2-Core 335
88% 180 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 927
92% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,462
90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Dell(1028 0BE5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3302
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 9.8
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9b1 NVMe Samsung 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 46303039 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 941 877 674 616 646 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 952
Write 704
Mixed 719
SusWrite 761
176% 784 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 44.7
158% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 602
432% 567 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 158%
Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 5.1
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 248
16% 248 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex Micro 7010 Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex Micro 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback