MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 08:42
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 343
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 35.2
26% 33.5 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 22.7
24% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 7.1 26 56 109 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 427
Write 352
Mixed 292
SusWrite 92.6
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 16.5
65% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 31.4
42% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 55%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
111GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 142 142 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 451
Write 439
Mixed 335
SusWrite 166
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 43.5
147% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 172
178% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
588GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 194 197 195 197 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 158
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 194
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
668GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 98.1
Mixed 74
SusWrite 101
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.4
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC208 PHL 271E1
Typical B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 1,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback