HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 04:40
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 553
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.5% Below average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 48.6
45% 53.6 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 0.3
22% 31.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 89 55 44 43 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
MB3000GVYZH 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 183 189 193 195 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 189
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 184
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.2
275% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x] 2133DDCD4 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIA0AE Panasonic-TV
Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback