Acidanthera iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAcidanthera iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-DB15BD556843C820
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 23:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 435
59% 439 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 263
Parallax 316
233% 288 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 239
Splatting 187
204% 260 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 199%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 315 338 320 241 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 370
Mixed 325
SusWrite 295
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 42.3
136% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 167
175% 288 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 131 122 129 124 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 111
Write 99
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 126
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
74% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
880GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 176 176 176 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 172
Mixed 101
SusWrite 175
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Acidanthera iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback