Gigabyte GA-P55V4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55V4  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 22:34
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 199
66% 122 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 462
49% 393 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Gigabyte(1458 1555) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3623
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 39.1
8% 25.7 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 0.2
20% 27.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LMT-128L9M 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HM73001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 202 282 272 270 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 409
Write 296
Mixed 254
SusWrite 266
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 26.5
95% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 170
155% 239 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 117 134 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 143
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 130
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55V4 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback