Gigabyte GA-P55V4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55V4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 01:24
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 95.6
37% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 215
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Gigabyte(1458 1555) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.42% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 11
Parallax 11.9
9% 11.2 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 13.8
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LMT-128L9M 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HM73001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 283 302 295 282 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 339
Write 297
Mixed 233
SusWrite 296
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 18.4
65% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 138
114% 163 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 136 132 131 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 119
Write 136
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 132
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55V4 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback