Gigabyte GA-P55V4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55V4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 20:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 37.8
28% 38.9 Pts
4-Core 98.9
8-Core 215
18% 157 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Gigabyte(1458 1555) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.07% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 10.8
9% 10.8 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 10.9
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LMT-128L9M 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HM73001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 268 283 294 285 307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 398
Write 293
Mixed 235
SusWrite 286
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 16.4
61% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 119
105% 160 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 132 133 134 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 135
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 130
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55V4 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback