MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 19:50
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 919
90% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,508
93% 1,508 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5525 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 313
Reflection 281
Parallax 352
255% 316 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 244
Splatting 173
200% 256 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 210%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 1179 137 88 75 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,240
Write 2,276
Mixed 1,340
SusWrite 438
299% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 75.1
256% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 928
DQ Mixed 1,122
826% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 204%
Great: 368%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
524GB free
Firmware: CS900KA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 460 459 460 461 459 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 423
Mixed 364
SusWrite 458
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 36.9
133% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 203
178% 262 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 104%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2431 2438 2438 2451 2447 2441 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 1970
Write 2,456
Mixed 2,118
SusWrite 2,441
509% 2,246 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 74.9
258% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 1,178
870% 1,152 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 358%
Great: 530%
Braveeagle 960GB 960GB
676GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 469 438 435 434 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 453
Mixed 399
SusWrite 445
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 46.4
155% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 107
148% 271 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 80 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 135
Write 150
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 79.6
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 859B BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 26.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 22,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $859
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback