HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy) (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B5E
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161104
Uptime	20.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	77%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 160 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 512 47% 392 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	147% Outstanding	Lighting 215 Reflection 200 Parallax 189 175% 201 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 149 Splatting 133 126% 157 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$49 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 286 247 344 334 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64% Good	Read 252 Write 311 Mixed 254 SusWrite 299 63% 279 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 20 70% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 148 158% 262 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 125%
Toshiba MG03ACA300 3TB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2TB free Firmware: FL1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 153 141 154 158 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 143 Write 138 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 154 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB 6,792 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.5% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 20.3 70% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy) Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	318x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	207x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	76x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	274x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	11x

RAM
M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 36%, 4,338 samples	30x
M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 2,041 samples	29x
M378A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,600 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16