MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 13:49
Run Duration449 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 270
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,023
96% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,513
94% 1,513 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 204
Parallax 221
164% 209 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 223
Splatting 149
167% 213 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 152%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
528GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1205 1159 1349 1395 1356 1342 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2451
Write 2,304
Mixed 1,784
SusWrite 1,301
439% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 79.6
262% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,234
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1,052
790% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 306%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
87GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 280 163 163 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 472
Mixed 429
SusWrite 228
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 51
169% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
53GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 425 422 454 436 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 220
Mixed 258
SusWrite 432
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 51.8
174% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 250
213% 312 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 126%
WDC WD180PURZ-85AFFY0 18TB
553GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 149 132 134 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 185
Write 177
Mixed 120
SusWrite 141
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 0.6
17% 7.07 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 6.6
DQ Mixed 3.4
3% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 31%
WDC WD180PURZ-85AFFY0 18TB
35GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 188 183 185 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 187
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 0.7
16% 6.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 4.7
DQ Mixed 3.1
2% 3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 31%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
21GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 140 141 134 122 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 133
Write 99.1
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 133
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 106%
WD WD140EMFZ-11 14TB
70GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 178 173 174 180 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 187
Mixed 143
SusWrite 174
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 2.5
608% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 117%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
729GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 153 153 153 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 97.4
Write 98.5
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 153
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 24,793
Mixed 99.1
8,896% 12,446 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1
935% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
43GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 129 130 129 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$145
50GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 23,013
Mixed 83.1
8,254% 11,548 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
253% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
29GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 174 143 176 151 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 184
Write 187
Mixed 129
SusWrite 159
222% 165 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1
312% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 95%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
101GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 134
Write 51.6
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 24.7
73% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28%
Great: 81%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
105GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 158 166 149 159 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 153
Write 159
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 156
175% 131 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
163% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 81%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
52GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 40.7
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 42.8
54% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
135% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 81%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
77GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 86 78 117 90 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 92.8
Write 95.4
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 98.2
122% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 66%
WD My Book 25ED 14TB
5.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 160 163 151 155 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 178
Write 182
Mixed 193
SusWrite 155
243% 177 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.2
337% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 104%
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
12TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 211 204 213 212 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 208
Mixed 161
SusWrite 209
266% 195 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 2.4
372% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.3
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 6,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17) - $450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $1,135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback