Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 17:21
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$90
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 106
45% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 138
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.5% Average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 66
51% 64.6 fps
MRender 46
Gravity 55.6
Splatting 49.6
41% 50.4 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 140 88 89 86 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 339
Write 319
Mixed 288
SusWrite 116
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 27.2
91% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 325
242% 321 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
325GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 153 153 148 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 118
Write 144
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 149
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
131GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 160 157 149 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 142
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 148
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2133 2OZ 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $741
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback