Colorful DJ C.H310M-E D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful DJ C.H310M-E D3  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful DJ C.H310M-E D3
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 03:10
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 191
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 317
40% 305 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 361 377 373 361 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 394
Write 306
Mixed 319
SusWrite 363
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 22.3
91% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 68.3
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 37.4
64% 117 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-076.A00LF 9905471-074.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DJ C.H310M-E D3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Colorful DJ C.H310M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback