Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	39.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200113
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '23 at 03:17
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 68.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 226 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 794 75% 621 Pts	64-Core 1,336 83% 1,336 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Asus(1043 884F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 188 Reflection 180 Parallax 170 153% 179 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 141 Splatting 123 121% 152 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,264 Write 1,131 Mixed 958 249% 1,118 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 55.5 188% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 678 DQ Write 811 DQ Mixed 268 334% 586 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 17,877 User benchmarks, average bench 247% 71GB free Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 590 609 625 622 612 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 629 Write 348 Mixed 339 SusWrite 603 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 9.4 49% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 902 DQ Write 650 DQ Mixed 634 512% 729 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 333%
Intenso Sata III 240GB 2,859 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 69GB free Firmware: P0925A SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 73 59 59 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 389 Write 344 Mixed 326 SusWrite 98.6 65% 289 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 14.7 53% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 62.3 DQ Mixed 79.5 62% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 102%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1TB free Firmware: MZ6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 125 128 125 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 91 Write 124 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 125 64% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 87%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 806GB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 65 71 66 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 48.8 Write 68.9 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 68 83% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/16GX KF3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX KF3200C16D4/16GX 64GB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	69.9% Good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 28.7 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 27.3 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	507x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16