HP 750-514

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 750-514  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 23:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 331
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
HP(103C 8903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 114
Parallax 118
105% 120 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 100
Splatting 82.6
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 91.5
Mixed 135
50% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 27.8
117% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 127
122% 201 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
895GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 166 167 170 173 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 164
Mixed 108
SusWrite 163
114% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU67J5213N8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-514 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback