Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 17:49
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 671
69% 556 Pts
64-Core 909
56% 909 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.3% Good
Lighting 91.1
Reflection 107
Parallax 76.8
74% 91.6 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 62.3
57% 70.3 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 343
Mixed 91.1
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 28.5
109% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 104
99% 161 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
32GB free
Firmware: S4500105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 384
Mixed 358
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 42.2
136% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 239
196% 280 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 130%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
48GB free
Firmware: JE3OA60A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.5
Write 6
Mixed 7
6% 7.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2133C15-16GIS 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M DS3H V2 Builds (Compare 5,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback