MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive506% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D15
MotherboardMSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 190
2-Core 374
114% 217 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,437
124% 1,060 Pts
64-Core 1,834
114% 1,834 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 63
55% 66 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 63.1
54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4454 4878 2705 1867 1869 1865 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
506% Outstanding
Read 2,945
Write 4,534
Mixed 2,858
SusWrite 2,940
752% 3,319 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 325
4K Mixed 127
444% 175 MB/s
DQ Read 1770
DQ Write 1,431
DQ Mixed 1,722
1,256% 1641 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 506%
Great: 508%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
125GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 356 342 336 326 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 440
Mixed 282
SusWrite 349
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 44.7
169% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 146
164% 279 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
103GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 70 73 74 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 84
Write 84.1
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 72.8
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 29.8
Mixed 13
SusWrite 14.8
28% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2133C15-16GIS 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24.1" 1280 720 ENC2796 EV2456
Typical MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15) Builds (Compare 3,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback