TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 18:47
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 259
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 853
81% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,396
86% 1,396 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 79.2%
 Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Zotac(19DA 4630)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 127
Parallax 125
113% 130 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 90.4
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 43 44 43 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
84GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,977
Write 2,208
Mixed 1,736
442% 1,974 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 68.7
246% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1,380
DQ Write 1,103
DQ Mixed 1,218
918% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
71GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 89 86 88 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 85.2
Write 77.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 86.3
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 49.2%
 Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
152GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 137 136 135 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 157
Write 167
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 136
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 84.1%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 24.5
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 24.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 62%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples3,624x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples2,729x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples1,095x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples1,297x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples990x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples989x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples678x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples425x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples352x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples939x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples598x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples430x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback