Radiant 1671-1672

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRadiant 1671-1672  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 86
2-Core 173
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 308
39% 298 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 58.5
46% 59.9 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 51.9
47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-S25M4-120G-9IG 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FMA028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 85 111 117 125 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 375
Write 132
Mixed 147
SusWrite 106
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 12.1
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 8.6
26% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33
376GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 96 97 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 98.1
Mixed 53
SusWrite 94.2
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
916GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 126 129 129 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 124
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1671-1672 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Radiant 1671-1672

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $79
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback