CCL Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCCL Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B450 GAMING X
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220124
Uptime191.5 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 09:50
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 687
69% 558 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 105
Parallax 93.5
75% 97 fps
MRender 92.2
Gravity 90
Splatting 82.3
72% 88.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,081
Write 1,348
Mixed 379
277% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 37.4
158% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 327
276% 412 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
16GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 90 89 90 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 239
Write 116
Mixed 167
SusWrite 92.8
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 35.8
127% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.3
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 100
77% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 73%
Cx2-8b256-q11 NVMe LITEON 256GB
191GB free
Firmware: 48811QD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 817 810 802 814 812 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 941
Write 764
Mixed 598
SusWrite 797
174% 775 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 47.8
161% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 588
486% 702 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 170%
Great: 208%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
106GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 47 49 50 59 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 82.7
Write 98.6
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 52.1
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
11GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 74 72 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 70.5
Write 70.4
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 74.2
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.2% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 28.2
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: CCL Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $563
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback