Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 20:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 242
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 396
49% 376 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 47.7
45% 60.3 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 43.1
37% 44.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 105 96 137 122 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 417
Write 262
Mixed 318
SusWrite 120
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 30.2
120% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 153
128% 189 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SM4U610CM0888DAFC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback