Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '23 at 19:10
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	71%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$120 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 56 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 81.4 48% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 137 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 55 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 48.2 45% 59.4 fps	MRender 41.5 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 44.4 37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 114 59 89 57 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 312 Write 118 Mixed 256 SusWrite 91.9 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 23.7 85% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 211 178% 256 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
SM4U610CM0888DAFC 1x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 55%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	224x
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	42x
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	54x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	42x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	42x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	33x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	24x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	19x

RAM
CM4X8GF2666C16K8 2x8GBCorsairBench 79%, 838 samples	55x
BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 80%, 2,551 samples	21x
CM4X4GF2666C16K4 2x4GBCorsairBench 81%, 458 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16