Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 12:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 276
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 989
93% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,445
89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Gigabyte(1458 40FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 187
Parallax 208
165% 199 fps
MRender 283
Gravity 163
Splatting 122
147% 190 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 147%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme AGI1T0G16AI198 1TB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 112 1158 1553 307 466 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,390
Write 164
Mixed 246
SusWrite 616
131% 604 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 15.6
112% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 222
238% 416 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 148%
Great: 232%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
111GB free
Firmware: T0824A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 353 419 423 420 286 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 27.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback