Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	22 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '23 at 01:53
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$242 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 94% 171 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 964 93% 766 Pts	64-Core 1,048 65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.9% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 108 Parallax 108 92% 110 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 101 Splatting 94.7 88% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 1056 936 902 855 816 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	293% Outstanding	Read 2,677 Write 2,091 Mixed 1,357 SusWrite 1,006 397% 1,783 MB/s	4K Read 54.8 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 72.2 246% 87 MB/s	DQ Read 1,337 DQ Write 849 DQ Mixed 1,019 780% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 293% Great: 393%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 149GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 112 113 94 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 96.3 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 101 67% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 23GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 119 122 139 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 58.9 Write 78.2 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 131 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 81GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 141 145 144 143 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 96.5 Write 101 Mixed 77 SusWrite 144 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 884GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 148 148 148 149 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 144 Write 88.3 Mixed 76 SusWrite 146 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 114%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 103 102 94 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 100 Write 112 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 94.4 135% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 47% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 57GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 103 102 95 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.2% Below average	Read 89.8 Write 86 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 94.8 109% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2G43MX3-CTD 2x16GB 612 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 23.4 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 30.3 SC Mixed 24.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 11,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $242Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,996x
Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,762x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,650x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	942x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	877x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	783x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	459x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	445x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	349x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	486x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	404x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	340x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $760

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16