Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NS
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 16:02
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 790
75% 622 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600S
Asus(1043 231D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.40.01.11
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 104
Reflection 156
Parallax 182
85% 147 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 134
Splatting 185
133% 159 fps
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1546 1556 1071 73 78 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,714
Write 1,380
Mixed 1,365
SusWrite 734
291% 1,299 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 35.5
195% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 837
593% 764 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 203%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 38.8
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback