HP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89C0
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221025
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 15:52
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 50.9
1-Core 177
2-Core 320
93% 183 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 524
79% 572 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 89C0) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 21.4
14% 30.7 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 17.4
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 720 943 882 1080 1314 1588 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 1,148
Mixed 1,188
SusWrite 1,088
280% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 56.3
188% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 665
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 506
367% 487 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 209%
Great: 400%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AEBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 19.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback