HP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89C0
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 01:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 187
2-Core 368
109% 210 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,167
111% 920 Pts
64-Core 1,884
117% 1,884 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 89C0) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 28.1
21% 42.6 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 22.5
22% 27.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 981
Write 794
Mixed 741
186% 839 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 59.3
190% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 479
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 568
385% 470 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AEBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP ZBook Power 15.6 inch G9 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback