Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140930
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 09:52
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 167
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 468
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 52.4
43% 54.3 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 46.7
42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3403101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 25 123 174 194 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.3% Below average
Read 212
Write 186
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 96.3
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 8.6
59% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 11.2
18% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
64GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 110 70 72 25 1 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.2% Poor
Read 163
Write 88
Mixed 121
SusWrite 69.9
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 14.6
54% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 18.6
14% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 134 135 136 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 133
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 93 98 100 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 13.4
Write 44.4
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 97.3
30% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SRT4G86U1-H9H 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-DS2 Builds (Compare 2,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback