Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515EA
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '23 at 02:36
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1135G7 36,962 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 10.4 1-Core 21 2-Core 80 17% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 122 15% 115 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 14.9 7% 11.5 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 2,488 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 180 141 144 148 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	40% Below average	Read 349 Write 244 Mixed 255 SusWrite 157 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 12.2 41% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 97.4 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 142 91% 104 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 171%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Kingston 9905711-067.A00G 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.9% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 8.5 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 3.1 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 400 10% 400 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	1,353x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	999x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	862x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	516x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GBNvmeBench 152%, 569 samples	105x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBSamsungBench 62%, 1,146 samples	291x
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 32%, 6,771 samples	242x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	168x