HP ZBook 14u G6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP ZBook 14u G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8549
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 16:17
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 180
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 170
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 8549) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 6.3
4% 11.1 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2200 NVMe 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22000120 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,137
Write 933
Mixed 826
214% 965 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 33.5
108% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 294
217% 289 MB/s
Poor: 87% Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905704-014.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 14u G6 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 14u G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback