AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220708
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 09:11
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 297
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 760
80% 639 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 26.6
15% 21.3 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 19.5
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1435 326 62 67 66 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,656
Write 1,448
Mixed 1,248
SusWrite 336
262% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 36.5
208% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 900
684% 920 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 189%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BRBN2G816G8C3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 28.1
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 26.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SER Builds (Compare 793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback