bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 00:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 384
43% 336 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 107
Parallax 96.2
75% 98.1 fps
MRender 89.1
Gravity 90
Splatting 83.4
71% 87.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 126 136 133 133 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 382
Write 146
Mixed 208
SusWrite 133
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 29.5
107% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 171
130% 177 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
197GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 66 70 68 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 96.5
Write 98.3
Mixed 77
SusWrite 68.4
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x435435313236344241313333392E433136 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback