bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 03:06
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 97
2-Core 188
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 489
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 110
Parallax 98.5
78% 101 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 84.6
73% 90 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 127 130 128 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 226
Write 151
Mixed 182
SusWrite 129
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 23.3
81% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 160
121% 163 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 88%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
487GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 104 104 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 135
Mixed 55
SusWrite 104
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x435435313236344241313333392E433136 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback