Asus PRIME B550M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 11:15
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 167
2-Core 328
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,090
104% 861 Pts
64-Core 1,401
87% 1,401 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 35.4
21% 28 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 22.7
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2183 2230 2190 2246 2250 2260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 1,761
Write 2,216
Mixed 1,901
SusWrite 2,226
459% 2,026 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 83.5
280% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 1058
DQ Mixed 1,142
857% 1,144 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 344%
Great: 365%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
569GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1885 1923 1924 794 401 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,749
Write 1,742
Mixed 1,835
SusWrite 1,226
369% 1,638 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 84.6
284% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,199
DQ Mixed 1261
949% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 290%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 148 149 150 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 100
Write 137
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 147
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
556GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 131 131 131 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 71
Write 95.5
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 132
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 114%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
82GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 66 67 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 65.8
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 66.5
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 37.3
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 34.8
108% 37.9 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B550M-A Builds (Compare 2,477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback