User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSANGFOR Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
MotherboardBochs Bochs
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '17 at 06:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7700-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 151
55% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 287
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sangfor FastIO 107GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.7% Good
Read 147
Write 426
Mixed 266
64% 280 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 1.32
119% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 1.25
DQ Mixed 0.92
30% 79 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Sangfor FastIO 43GB
40GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 20.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback