HP ProDesk 400 G4 DM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G4 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83F3
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '23 at 18:34
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 150
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 485
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,074
Write 903
Mixed 828
208% 935 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 47.5
153% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 478
435% 667 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G4 DM Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G4 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback