LG 15N540-UT50K

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	9.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	LG 15N540-UT50K (all builds)
Motherboard	LG White Tip Mountain
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141030
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '23 at 13:33
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210M 15,981 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 33 1-Core 59.7 2-Core 103 36% 65.2 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 146 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M 20,978 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1854 0214) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3623 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	9.19% Terrible	Lighting 12.2 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 12 10% 11.2 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 8.9 8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.19% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 813GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 328 372 371 388 399 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 321 Write 298 Mixed 303 SusWrite 356 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 18.3 60% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 199 148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 133%
Kingchuxing 512GB 512GB 505 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 429GB free Firmware: V0823A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 319 373 372 388 387 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 311 Write 273 Mixed 270 SusWrite 351 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 13.6 51% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 50.1 72% 133 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 224%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 2,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 114GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 45 25 31 39 36 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 128 Write 64.9 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 38.9 86% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2 114% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 58GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 27 23 23 30 32 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 118 Write 72.1 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 34.7 99% 79 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.2 163% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 12GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 4.9 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 15N540-UT50K Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: LG 15N540-UT50K

CPU
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	7x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
X120PRO 256GBKodakBench 72%, 7 samples	3x
DST6256 256GBBench 64%, 17 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	2x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	2x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $137

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369