Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 923 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 38.3 1-Core 25.4 2-Core 46.2 24% 36.6 Pts	4-Core 75.6 8-Core 67.4 10% 71.5 Pts	64-Core 50.4 3% 50.4 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 5,093 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 221D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 2.84 2% 3.32 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.43 3% 3.21 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB 2,337 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,515 Write 1,799 Mixed 1,092 328% 1,469 MB/s	4K Read 105 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 95.8 329% 97 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 189 142% 189 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 12GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 8.1 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 30%, 923 samples	15x
A10 PRO-7350B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 976 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 629 samples	13x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 634 samples	4x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 5,093 samples	2x

SSD
LCH-256V2S-HP 256GBLiteonBench 75%, 1,560 samples	4x
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	2x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 58%, 2,337 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	2x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	2x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16